Today's hottest deals

Foxconn H61MXV/H61MXV-LE/H67MXV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardFoxconn H61MXV/H61MXV-LE/H67MXV  (all builds)
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140103
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 18 '18 at 03:12
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2120-$170
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.2% Good
Memory 90.7
1-Core 87.1
2-Core 168
69% 115 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 218
29% 220 Pts
64-Core 224
14% 224 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Device(105B 0D78) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.02% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.42
Parallax 0.97
1% 1.16 fps
MRender 1.67
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 2
1% 1.49 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.02%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$49
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4.AAB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 57 66 66 71 71 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 72.6
Write 61.6
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 63.4
44% 60.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 42%
ZALMAN External HDD 1TB
549GB free, PID 2028
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 25 27 27 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Read 31.6
Write 21.5
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 26.1
33% 25.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-002. 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
52% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 16.4
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 16.6
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 52%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61MXV/H61MXV-LE/H67MXV Builds (Compare 125 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn H61MXV/H61MXV-LE/H67MXV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback