Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.36% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive54% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970A-DS3P  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130408
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 10 '18 at 10:55
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
65.7% Good
Memory 89.7
1-Core 66.2
2-Core 115
58% 90.4 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 309
34% 270 Pts
64-Core 285
18% 285 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
Palit(1569 0FC1) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
7.36% Terrible
Lighting 8.57
Reflection 7.73
Parallax 10
7% 8.77 fps
MRender 8.71
Gravity 10.1
Splatting 10.6
8% 9.78 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.36%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 120GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM91.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 186 188 105 91 95 MB/s
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54% Above average
Read 235
Write 184
Mixed 177
SusWrite 147
42% 186 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 57.3
4K Mixed 28.9
108% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 33.1
DQ Write 74.5
DQ Mixed 35
32% 47.5 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 54%
Great: 88%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 483GB
92GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 177 176 179 178 181 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 166
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 177
107% 147 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
169% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 101%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BA160 Kingston KHX1866C10D3/ 16GB
800, 933 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
34.5% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 10.3
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 11.3
28% 9.87 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-970A-DS3P Builds (Compare 3,269 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P - $149

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $318
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback