Today's hottest deals

Colorful iGame Z170 Ymir

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics59.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemColorful iGame Z170 Ymir  (all builds)
MotherboardColorful iGame Z170 Ymir
Memory14.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170629
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 09 '18 at 20:00
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$93
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Memory 95.3
1-Core 148
2-Core 295
99% 179 Pts
4-Core 592
8-Core 568
78% 580 Pts
64-Core 583
36% 583 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 416.16
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
59.4% Above average
Lighting 73.4
Reflection 76.7
Parallax 64.7
60% 71.6 fps
MRender 72.6
Gravity 69.2
Splatting 72.3
59% 71.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 498
Write 464
Mixed 417
102% 459 MB/s
4K Read 48.8
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 65
225% 80.8 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 355
269% 362 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB
19GB free
Firmware: CXZ7300Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 747 762 753 764 765 768 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
242% Outstanding
Read 1,794
Write 764
Mixed 631
SusWrite 760
218% 987 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 197
4K Mixed 69.4
239% 98.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1543
DQ Write 708
DQ Mixed 860
708% 1,037 MB/s
Poor: 133%
This bench: 242%
Great: 273%
WDC WD5000BEKT-6 500GB
221GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 93 93 93 93 93 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.5% Below average
Read 87.4
Write 91.6
Mixed 61.4
SusWrite 92.6
113% 83.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK8GX4M1A2400C14 029E CMK8GX4M1A2666C16 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 33.2
MC Mixed 26.6
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 32
SC Mixed 27.6
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 56.2
71% 56.2 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iGame Z170 Ymir Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Colorful iGame Z170 Ymir

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $113
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback