Today's hottest deals

AMD Dibbler

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive36.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAMD Dibbler  (all builds)
MotherboardAMD Dibbler
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180528
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 09 '18 at 08:31
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B Vega Gfx
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
58% Above average
Memory 71.3
1-Core 83.3
2-Core 182
63% 112 Pts
4-Core 242
8-Core 372
38% 307 Pts
64-Core 372
23% 372 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 58%
Great: 69%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB 120GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q1124A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 104 25 37 26 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 413
Write 362
Mixed 313
SusWrite 82.6
65% 292 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 12.5
4K Mixed 1
45% 12.6 MB/s
DQ Read 60.3
DQ Write 71.4
DQ Mixed 1.1
19% 44.3 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA451S6AFR8N-TF 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
76.9% Very good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 25.5
80% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 29.7
SC Mixed 21.6
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 98.4
41% 98.4 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback