PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 8.13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 167% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA (all builds) |
Memory | 10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20170607 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Sep 30 '18 at 17:50 |
Run Duration | 167 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 35% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
67.2%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R7 250
Gigabyte(1458 2270) 2GB
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.9.3
|
8.13%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$200
761GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 629 703 746 742 740 647 MB/s
|
167%
Outstanding
|
|||
PNY USB 2.0 FD 8GB
7GB free, PID 00d4
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 15 15 15 15 14 MB/s
|
10.9%
Very poor
|
|||
8GB free, PID fafa
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 6.9 6.8 9.7 6.1 9.3 MB/s
|
5.11%
Terrible
|
|||
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 64GB
39GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 8.6 8.4 8.5 8.1 8 MB/s
|
6.4%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 1866 CL10 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
48.9%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $85Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 440x |
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 114x |
FX-8370AMD $175Bench 62%, 34,720 samples | 86x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 89x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 66x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 53x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 63% - Good | Total price: $543 |