Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire TC-105

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemAcer Aspire TC-105  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-105
Memory3.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130725
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateSep 24 '18 at 21:08
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6700 APU (2013 D.Ri)-$130
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
57.7% Above average
Memory 77.9
1-Core 75.1
2-Core 135
58% 95.9 Pts
4-Core 217
8-Core 224
29% 221 Pts
64-Core 211
13% 211 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 620
Sapphire(174B 0620) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 331.65
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
2.09% Terrible
Lighting 2.53
Reflection 3.08
Parallax 1.94
2% 2.52 fps
MRender 3.14
Gravity 2.53
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.66 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.09%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
692GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 132 139 148 155 156 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 149
Write 119
Mixed 78.9
SusWrite 142
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 112%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 2GB
2GB free, PID 1607
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 8.3 8.5 8.5 8.7 8.5 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
6.46% Terrible
Read 22
Write 7.8
Mixed 6.8
SusWrite 8.4
13% 11.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
23% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.46%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LU1KBG/4G ACR16D3LU1KDG/2G 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.9% Poor
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 6.8
20% 7 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 8
21% 7.4 GB/s
Latency 84.5
47% 84.5 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire TC-105 Builds (Compare 68 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $210
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback