Today's hottest deals

ECS A58F2P-M4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardECS A58F2P-M4  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140508
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateSep 23 '18 at 01:07
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-5300 APU-$36
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
40.3% Average
Memory 64.9
1-Core 62.1
2-Core 95.3
46% 74.1 Pts
4-Core 94.2
8-Core 90
12% 92.1 Pts
64-Core 72.7
4% 72.7 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7480D
Elitegroup(1019 9A19) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
2.41% Terrible
Lighting 2.77
Reflection 4.04
Parallax 2.25
2% 3.02 fps
MRender 3.67
Gravity 1.97
Splatting 4.04
3% 3.23 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.41%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
655GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 134 150 166 171 169 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
90% Excellent
Read 158
Write 149
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 155
95% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 90%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-016.A00LF 99U5474-028.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.3% Poor
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 9.1
26% 8.93 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 9.8
22% 7.53 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A58F2P-M4 Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS A58F2P-M4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $106
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback