Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics54.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160826
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateSep 18 '18 at 19:14
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User EST-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Memory 96.6
1-Core 134
2-Core 267
93% 166 Pts
4-Core 456
8-Core 720
72% 588 Pts
64-Core 729
45% 729 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Gainward(10B0 13C2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Lighting 68.6
Reflection 70
Parallax 63.3
56% 67.3 fps
MRender 72.6
Gravity 62.5
Splatting 55
51% 63.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 485
Write 486
Mixed 390
101% 454 MB/s
4K Read 46.5
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 69.5
239% 88.8 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 360
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Corsai Force GT 120GB
9GB free
Firmware: 1.3.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 115 117 108 109 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 401
Write 144
Mixed 202
SusWrite 111
47% 214 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 42
178% 70.4 MB/s
DQ Read 191
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 149
117% 163 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$89
17GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 106 106 107 105 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 122
Write 120
Mixed 66
SusWrite 106
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
141% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 75%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$116
41GB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 155 161 158 156 159 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Read 161
Write 159
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 158
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
294% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 104%
Samsun HD103SJ 1TB
42GB free
Firmware: 1AJ1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 110 108 105 109 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 118
Write 40
Mixed 69
SusWrite 106
62% 83.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
218% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 79%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$53
38GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 111 111 100 90 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 139
Write 136
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 102
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
192% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 84%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
149GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 60 58 57 58 58 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
26.5% Poor
Read 62
Write 62.3
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 58.5
69% 51.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$42
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
MC Read 36.1
MC Write 36.9
MC Mixed 26.7
95% 33.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 34.6
SC Mixed 26.3
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 52
77% 52 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z170X-Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 3,791 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming 7 - $191

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $681
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback