Today's hottest deals

EVGA 152-HW-E878

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics42.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardEVGA 152-HW-E878  (all builds)
Memory28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141009
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 16 '18 at 02:21
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$75
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 79.9
1-Core 112
2-Core 214
76% 135 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 551
58% 466 Pts
64-Core 540
33% 540 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$449
EVGA(3842 4998) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1582 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 399.24
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.1% Average
Lighting 47.7
Reflection 55.1
Parallax 44.7
39% 49.1 fps
MRender 67.6
Gravity 47.6
Splatting 62
48% 59 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 87%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$175
713GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 200 196 207 211 213 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 339
Write 206
Mixed 244
SusWrite 204
56% 248 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 66.5
4K Mixed 41.9
137% 46.7 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 140
105% 141 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2133 C11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.5% Average
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 12.6
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 15
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 80.7
50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 152-HW-E878 Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: EVGA 152-HW-E878

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $282
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback