Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell OptiPlex GX110

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, GPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Memory	0.5GB is enough RAM for Windows XP.
OS Version	Windows XP is considerably out of date. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10. (Note: an additional 0.5GB of RAM is recommended prior to upgrading.)

Motherboard	Dell OptiPlex GX110 (all builds)
Memory	0.1 GB free of 0.5 GB @ 0.1 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit kleuren, 1024 x 768 x 16777216 kleuren
OS	Windows XP
BIOS Date	20000918
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 13 '14 at 15:57
Run Duration	595 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium III-processor Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 0.8 GHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		1-Core 5.2 2-Core 5.7 3% 5.45 Pts	4-Core 5.7 8-Core 5.7 1% 5.7 Pts	64-Core 6.1 0% 6.1 Pts

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Maxtor 6E040L0 41GB-$27 599 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 14GB free Max speed: UDMA 133 133 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (03) Spinup time 220 220 7187 (04) Start/Stop count 252 252 3402 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (06) Read channel margin 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 247 237 45084 (09) Power-on hours count 216 216 56907 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 245 245 3317 (C0) Power-off retract count 250 250 3297 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 251 251 10514 (C2) HDA temperature 253 253 40 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 253 252 1307 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 199 198 1 (C8) Write error rate 253 252 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 252 1 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 252 0 (CB) Run out cancel 253 252 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 253 252 0 (CD) Thermal asperity rate(TAR) 253 252 0 (CF) Spin high current 253 252 0 (D0) Spin buzz 253 252 0 (D1) Offline seek performance 187 182 0 (63) Unknown 253 253 0 (64) Unknown 253 253 0 (65) Unknown 253 253 0	23.4% Poor	Read 47.3 Write 34 Mixed 28.5 27% 36.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.17 4K Mixed 0.35 82% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 32%
Sandisk SDCFX-008G 8GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 1GB free Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	19.3% Very poor	Read 44.7 Write 19.8 Mixed 24.3 22% 29.6 MB/s	4K Read 6.61 4K Write 2.85 4K Mixed 2.04 555% 3.83 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 32%
WDC WD16 00JB-00GVC0 160GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 27GB free, PID null Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	11.3% Very poor	Read 17.9 Write 14.9 Mixed 15.9 20% 16.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.73 4K Mixed 0.42 75% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 17%
Generic Compact Flash 4GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 1GB free, PID 1345 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	2.75% Terrible	Read 7.7 Write 4.3 Mixed 5.51 7% 5.84 MB/s	4K Read 2.74 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.02 11% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.75% Great: 19%
SanDisk U3 Titanium 2GB 140 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free, PID 5408 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	4.48% Terrible	Read 13.8 Write 7.19 Mixed 9.5 12% 10.2 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 0.03 4K Mixed 0.03 15% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.48% Great: 7%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155	Nvidia RTX 4060 $299	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback