Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-B85N PHOENIX-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics35.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
SystemGigabyte B85N PHOENIX
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B85N PHOENIX-CF  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 02 '16 at 20:49
Run Duration677 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690-$56
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Memory 93.8
1-Core 114
2-Core 227
83% 145 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 444
59% 444 Pts
64-Core 444
28% 444 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Zotac(19DA 1375) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6510
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
35.1% Below average
Lighting 45.5
Reflection 44.4
Parallax 39.7
37% 43.2 fps
MRender 40
Gravity 40.3
Splatting 35.8
31% 38.7 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 178
Mixed 168
132% 175 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 2.01
4K Mixed 0.2
90% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 102%
Great: 107%
TomTom GO 2GB
2GB free, PID 0001
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
2.26% Terrible
Read 6.94
Write 2.92
Mixed 4.1
5% 4.65 MB/s
4K Read 2.36
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.02
10% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.26%
Great: 2%
TomTom GO 2GB
0GB free, PID 0001
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
2.9% Terrible
Read 8.29
Write 3.15
Mixed 3.89
6% 5.11 MB/s
4K Read 4.06
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.02
16% 1.36 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 51264Y160K 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
62.6% Good
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 18.9
62% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 20
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 60.3
66% 60.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B85N PHOENIX-CF Builds (Compare 106 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B85N PHOENIX-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $393
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback