PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 45.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP Z640 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 212A |
Memory | 51.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20160629 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Sep 03 '18 at 06:36 |
Run Duration | 125 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 12% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2623 v3
CPU0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
|
61.2%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro M5000
HP(103C 1152) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1126 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 7.5GB, Driver: 398.75
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
45.8%
Average
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
231GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 127 131 122 128 130 MB/s
|
84.3%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M393A1G40EB1-CPB 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
77.1%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-2620 v3IntelBench 66%, 6,890 samples | 113x |
Xeon E5-1650 v3IntelBench 77%, 7,962 samples | 107x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples | 99x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples | 155x |
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples | 119x |
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples | 64x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 16% - Very poor | Total price: $509 |