Today's hottest deals

HP xw8400 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive37.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP xw8400 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0A08h
Memory2.1 GB free of 4.00098 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101025
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 17 '18 at 02:26
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon 5150
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Memory 69.2
1-Core 29.6
2-Core 61
37% 53.3 Pts
4-Core 61.7
8-Core 60.7
8% 61.2 Pts
64-Core 61.6
4% 61.6 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 40%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$52
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF30
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 94 75 115 53 55 MB/s
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.1% Below average
Read 244
Write 168
Mixed 155
SusWrite 76.5
36% 161 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 29.3
4K Mixed 14.8
63% 20.9 MB/s
DQ Read 105
DQ Write 59.7
DQ Mixed 3.3
24% 56.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 55%
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102
160GB free
Firmware: 3.AH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 61 61 63 63 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 64.4
Write 41.9
Mixed 48.8
SusWrite 62.1
40% 54.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 43%
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102
179GB free
Firmware: 3.AH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 56 57 56 57 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
32.1% Below average
Read 56
Write 36.4
Mixed 43.9
SusWrite 55.7
36% 48 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 43%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22
212GB free
Firmware: 15.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
31.8% Below average
Read 99.5
Write 9.5
Mixed 17.2
SusWrite 11.2
25% 34.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
105% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 37GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 33792 MB
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.4% Very poor
MC Read 3
MC Write 2.6
MC Mixed 3.5
9% 3.03 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 4.4
10% 3.53 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical xw8400 Workstation Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP xw8400 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback